|
|
|
|
•Prior to change:
|
|
•The original purpose of the rule was to limit clothing items that were
loose fitting.
|
|
•Reason for change:
|
|
•With the advent of new products, limiting clothing items that were
loose fitting is no longer the case.
|
|
•The text of Rule 4-1-1c was amended and states that any other
undergarment that extends beyond the inseam of a one-piece uniform shall be
tight-fitting, single solid color, unadorned and shall not extend below the
knee.
|
|
•Case Book Situation: SITUATION
1
|
|
•Also mention that the manufacturer’s logo is NOT an adornment
|